Judge orders psychiatric tests in 11-year-old’s shooting case

» 2 Comments | Post a Comment

A Chesterfield judge said Wednesday he would not decide immediately if an 11-year-old Dillon boy accused of shooting his sister in the face was competent to stand trial.

Dillon County sheriff’s deputies said the boy and his sister were home alone Feb. 12 when they began arguing over a bag of potato chips.
The boy got his father’s .410 caliber shotgun and shot his sister in the face with it, Dillon County Chief Deputy Sheriff Douglas Pernell said.

Family Court Judge Roger Henderson said during Wednesday’s competency hearing that “he wasn’t convinced one way or another” on the issue after hearing the testimony of a state-employed psychologist who interviewed the boy in April.

Instead, Henderson ordered the boy — who was 10 when the shooting happened — to undergo a battery of psychiatric tests.

Dr. Alicia Hall, a psychologist with the S.C. Department of Mental Health, said during the hearing that she questioned the boy in April and again Wednesday morning and found him incompetent to stand trial.

During the hour-long April interview, the boy was found to be socially immature and had some developmental issues, Hall said.
“It was like I was interacting with a child that was 7 and not 10,” she said.

The boy also had a high level of anxiety and showed signs of having attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, or ADHD, she said.

The boy knew about the assault and battery with intent to kill charge he faced and he seemed to understand the gravity of the situation, Hall said.

It also appeared the boy lacks the ability to grasp the concept of long-term consequences, Hall said.

The boy was able to answer questions about the case after certain details were explained to him but this doesn’t mean he’s competent, she said.

Hall said the boy had trouble retaining information and would not be able to aid his attorney in his defense.

After the ordered psychiatric tests are complete, Henderson said he would meet with Rosalind Sellers, the boy’s attorney, and 4th Circuit Deputy Solicitor Kernard Redmond to discuss what would be done next.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by kingfish on July 25, 2008 at 8:41 pm

Once again they come up with all the problems a child has except parental guidance. The parents need to be held responsible for this. Why was the gun free for him to get to. Daddy didn’t lock it up. So who’s to blame ??? Most 10 yr olds don’t have alot of common sense but don’t label the kid with all these “problems” that they come up with. A little old time parenting would solve 95% of the problems kids have nowadays.

Flag Comment Posted by angelswalk on July 24, 2008 at 9:55 am

Big question here.
What could the child have been living with and seeing to make him think shooting his sis in the face over a bag of chips was the thing to do to settle an argument?
When children this young do such horrible things, you know there has been some kind of influence to that effect in their lives. He doesn’t just need to walk away from this but obviously he needs a stable environment! Little sis needs a stable environment as well.
Not judging anyone, just a fair question and statement.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement