Florence residents, mayor weigh in on proposed smoking ban
Florence residents, mayor weigh in on proposed...
On Nov. 9, Florence City Council will vote on a proposed smoking ban in most public places.and Dwight Dana
Published: November 2, 2009
Updated: November 3, 2009
FLORENCE — On Nov. 9, Florence City Council will vote on a proposed smoking ban in most public places.
The ordinance would prohibit smoking in places like restaurants, bars, educational and health care facilities, common areas of apartment buildings as well as many other places.
Though it may face opposition from some smokers, the ordinance is gaining popularity from many local residents.
“I don’t like to determine what other people do, but we have been out west to California and Phoenix in the past year and it’s banned everywhere out there and there’s a difference, and it is nice not to have to worry about that in public if you don’t have to,” Florence resident Jennifer Peebles said.
Even some restaurant managers say they support the proposal, though they say they will continue to try and accommodate everyone.
“I think it’s a good thing because we definitely aim to please all of our customers and I think as long as someone can step outside and smoke a cigarette, then we’ll kind of keep everyone,” said Wendy Vesco, floor manager at Apple Annie’s, said.
Some smokers say the measure would restrict their freedom, while others say the ordinance would simply enforce the freedom of others who choose not to smoke.
“I just didn’t realize, but now I can see where everybody would be offended by it, because I get around them now and I don’t really care to sit there,” former smoker James Moore said.
Council members who support the ordinance, along with Florence Mayor Stephen J. Wukela, say smoking poses a public health issue. They, and many residents, say smoking bans have worked in other areas across the state and across the country, and many of them believe the ban could work just as well in the city.
Twenty-eight other cities in South Carolina have passed similar smoke-free ordinances.
Wukela said he believes it is the right choice for Florence.
“I think the evidence is overwhelming that smoking is dangerous to health. It causes cancer and other health abnormalities and it’s appropriate to ban it in public places where the public doesn’t have any choice,” he said. “I also have a particular concern for workers in restaurants and bars who are forced to be exposed to smoking against their will, as well.”
Among others, the proposed ordinance would prohibit smoking in such enclosed public areas as galleries, libraries, museums, bars, bingo facilities, elevators, convention facilities, conference centers, exhibition halls, educational facilities (public and private), health care facilities, hotel and motel lobbies, licensed childcare and adult daycare facilities, and polling places.
Smoking also would be banned in lobbies, hallways, and other common areas in apartment buildings, condominiums, trailer parks, retirement facilities, nursing homes and other multiple-unit residential facilities, private clubs when being used for a function to which the general public is invited, restaurants, restrooms, lobbies, reception areas, hallways and other common-use areas.
In addition, smoking would be prohibited in public transportation facilities, including buses and taxicabs and ticket, boarding and waiting areas of public transit depots, retail stores, service lines, shopping malls sports arenas and rooms, chambers, places of meeting or public assembly, including school buildings.
The ordinance includes certain outdoor areas “when the use involves a gathering of the public, regardless of the number actually assembled for the event, performance or competition,” as well. This includes amphitheaters, ball parks and stadiums when in use for athletic competitions or public performances, parades and special events on public streets and city property (although the city manager has the discretion, but not the obligation, to establish designated smoking areas in or in proximity to the parade or event area), dining areas in encroachment areas on public sidewalks, plazas and parks and dining areas on decks, balconies and patios of restaurants and bars, public places and public sidewalks abutting acute care hospital property lines and zoos.
City council meets at 1 p.m. Nov. 9 in room 604 of the Florence City-County Complex, 180 N. Irby St., Florence. For more information, including contact information for council members, call Dianne Rowan, clerk to council, at (843) 665-3177.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
No one is asking that smoking be allowed on planes, in hospitals, daycares, government buildings, etc. To make that statement is uncalled for. What we are saying is that to ban smoking in bars is going too far and most restaurants already have chosen to be smoking or non-smoking, so why must there be a law to enact what is already in place? Give the establishments the option of whether to be smoking or non-smoking. As I have stated, I do not smoke, but I still do not think that I have the right to discriminate against those who chose to. Allow Freedom of Choice to rule. If you do not want to be around smoking then choose a bar or restaurant that opts to be non-smoking. But if someone does want to smoke, then they have a right to have a place to go also. Do you realize that under this proposal, if you have a large family and a large group of friends and were planning a party in a building that you rented, then this proposal would apply?
You got me. Thats what I want, more crime.
I think there is a big chance this ban on public smoking will not pass.
Maybe you can get them to let you smoke in airplanes & the in hospitals again.
reddog: Have you ever tried “Freemans Bakery”? Good Stuff.
http://bakingtheworldabetterplace.com/freemans/
Ok folks lets just move on, we all know that it will become an ordinance and eventually state law then federal law. And we all know that if you are a smoker you are beneath the level of the Righteous. So lets just move on to the next important issue, like trying to get a good Bakery in town.
I think if someone wants to smoke a big cigar after having open heart surgery while laying in the hospital bed ... then so be it!
I think people should be able to smoke a cigarette while picking there toddler up from day care. Just don’t ash the floor.
GG,
I am going to write this real slow and maybe in terms that you will better understand. Using some of your own words, you have a right to your opinion, however you do NOT have the right to try to pour or shove it down the throat of others. Does that help you to better understand what is being said? It is not about the smoking, but about your rights, at the same time I am defending others rights, I am defending your rights also. Since you will not answer questions regarding what some of your likes are, then we are to assume that you have some that you fear if they are brought to light, then they may be next on Council’s agenda to ban!! So when that happens, you may want to change the name you use here, so that those of us who tried to warn you, will not know that it is you screaming about how your rights have been discriminated against and denied!! Not sure that we will feel much sympathy for you then.
g…ummm…how many posts have you made, or responded to, basically stating the same pro-ban rhetoric each time? You made your point with the first comment. Yet you seem to feel compelled to debate everyone else’s opinion in order to prove you are right and they are stupid to think otherwise. Why is that g? And you state I am the one saying the same thing over and over…puhleez. Tired of it all pegged you to a tee.
I have read all of the commnts and about what annoys people. I think that we should go back to the old days where smoking was admissable, so was the guns and prostitution and the gambling. Then if you did not like something - you could pull out your gun or knife and just kill someone that offended you! There was never a problem there! Then the dead were just dragged down to the undertaker’s parlor.
Thinx, no one said this proposed smoking ban is the most important thing or serious problem anywhere in this town or the world.
Its an article & there is a vote on the table. Period. No one said it was going to cure any other problems like crime. No one said this issue is more important than any other issue. Your saying that over and over does not make it so.
Crow, smoking IN PUBLIC is not a right.
If you think it is, you need to educate yourself on the definition of rights.
The fact that its way over taxed does not make it a right either.
So, [cg] “smoking was never your right, you have just been getting away with it.“ Really? I am not nor have been a smoker, but you are incorrect. Tobacco was and IS a legal product on which the govt. makes a fortune in taxes. And the tobacco giants are the biggest cash cow of the screamers on the left.[for health care].9 million American soldiers who were issued a pack a day in their foxholes would line up to kick your as# also. Thanks to those cigarette smoking fiends you can now spout socialism.


Advertisement