People near, far speak out at Pamplico coal plant meeting

» 3 Comments | Post a Comment

Hundreds of people packed the Hannah-Pamplico gymnasium Thursday to make their voices heard about Santee Cooper’s proposed Pee Dee Energy Campus.

The $1.25 billion project, a 600-megawatt coal-fired generation facility, is proposed to be located on a 2,709-acre tract along the Great Pee Dee River.

Some residents of the area are ready to get the discussion over with. Pamplico Mayor Gene Gainey said he is eager for the approval to build the Pee Dee Energy Campus.

“As far as I’m concerned, it’s time to resolve this issue and get to building this plant,” he said.

But, Clair Boatwright, spokeswoman for the S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control, said the process is necessary to insure that adequate attention has been given to every detail of the proposed facility.

“The concerns that are brought forward have to have a basis in science and a basis in law,” she said. “If those two criteria are met, it absolutely is taken seriously. ”

Boatwright said nothing has been decided or will be decided for quite some time.

Despite it still being early in the process, people from throughout the state and country came out to voice their opinions about the proposed coal plant.

Dr. James Hansen, national climatologist and Director of NASA’s Goddard Institute, said in a phone interview Thursday, the rules of the energy game need to change to benefit everyone, not just the people at the top. To do that, he said, coal must be phased out and efficiency made the focus of people’s efforts.

“One coal plant can point at another one and say it’s better than the other, but both are very dirty,” Hansen said.

Busloads of people from Alcoa, the world leader in aluminum production, showed up to support the plant.

Meanwhile, buses carrying students from colleges and universities in the Upstate arrived to express their displeasure with coal power.

Laura Varn, spokeswoman for Santee Cooper, confirmed that Alcoa is one of the largest industrial customers of the energy company.

“It’s very important to them as it is for all industrial and residential customers,” she said. “By their show of support, they’re showing how crucial it is to them.”

But some of the residents think the issue should be left in the hands of the people who live where the plant will be located.

Ricky Hardee, co-chair of the Pee Dee Supporters for Progress, said his organization gave out 150 t-shirts to people living in Pamplico who were planning to come out in support of the coal plant.

“I think it should be more of a local issue,” he said. “It directly impacts this community as a whole. We’re desperate for jobs.”

S.C. Rep. Terry Alexander, of District 59, said he thinks energy efficiency is a nice idea in theory, but it action it’s a lot more complicated than it sounds.

“We have a lot of folks in our community who don’t have good houses and sealed windows,” he said. “You’re talking about low income folks who have to put up plastic on their windows to stay warm.”

Mike King, a member of the Pee Dee River Watchers, said he thinks if community leaders think the plant will be a boon to the area, “they are the biggest group of nitwits ever assembled in South Carolina.”

Advertisement

 
View More: coal,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by robbos on October 24, 2008 at 1:31 pm

Who is Mike King to be calling anybody “a bunch of nitwits”? And who are the Pee Dee River Watchers?  I personally use the Pee Dee River to hunt and fish year round from the 301 bridge to the mouth of the Little Pee Dee and hevent seen a thing to do with any Pee Dee River Watcher. In my opinion Im a Pee Dee River Watcher! If that is the case, I think anyone against the coal plan is a nitwit! Am I the only one?  And if Im not mistaken Mr. King resides upriver from the proposed site. I also agree with tcalcutt that if you dont live near here or have anything to do with this area such as schools, work, and etc., dont worry about it!  Economic growth is great!  But this is just my 2 cents!

Flag Comment Posted by creekgirl4life on October 24, 2008 at 10:32 am

It is apparent that the area needs jobs and more energy to support economic development in the region.  Residents are concerned about jobs and the enviornment but there are also far reaching effects from continuing to rely on coal.
While the proposed coal plant is supposed to be clean the effects in coal mining areas are devastating.
<object width=“425” height=“350”></param></param><embed src=“http://www.youtube.com/v/BBoxTeonglw” type=“application/x-shockwave-flash” wmode=“transparent” width=“425” height=“350”></embed></object>

Flag Comment Posted by tcalcutt on October 24, 2008 at 1:19 am

We reside in the greatest nation in the world, that let’s us disagree but at the same time move forward with progress. I don’t think that students that do not pay taxes or live in the Hannah-Pamplico community, should be allowed to voice an opinion at the expense of mom and dad taxpayer that is sending them to college to learn how to survive in cooporate America. Our community needs this plant. Let the community solve the problems on our own.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement