Hinson sentenced to 25 years in underground bunker case
Hinson Sentecing
Hinson Sentecing
AP File Photo
This file photo taken Oct. 26, 2006, shows Kenneth Glenn Hinson standing in the courtroom during a hearing in Darlington. Hinson, a convicted sex offender acquitted on charges of raping two teenage girls in an underground bunker, says his accusers shouldn’t be allowed to testify at his sentencing hearing on a gun charge. Hinson’s sentencing hearing is scheduled for Friday in Florence.
FLORENCE — A Hartsville man once accused of holding two girls in an underground bunker in Darlington County has been sentenced to 25 years in federal prison after a lengthy hearing punctuated by his outbursts.
In addition to the 300-month sentence handed down Friday, 49-year-old Kenneth Glenn Hinson also received five years of probation.
It took the jury about five minutes Nov. 8 to convict Hinson of being a felon in possession of a firearm. He was sentenced late Friday afternoon after a six-hour hearing.
The sentence followed the emotional testimony of four women who said they were sexually assaulted by Hinson.
One of Hinson’s nieces told U.S. District Court Judge Terry L. Wooten, who presided over the hearing, that Hinson had raped her when she was just 23 months old and molested her again when she was 11.
Hinson was convicted of criminal sexual conduct in 1991 after he molested an 11-year-old girl. That victim also appeared in court to face Hinson on Friday.
The victim told Wooten that Hinson was supposed to be driving her to school that day, but instead drove into a wooded area, pulled her into the back of his van and raped her at knifepoint. The attack happened just two days before her birthday.
“I said everything I could to get him to stop. I said, ‘I love you. You’re hurting me, please stop,’” she said.
After the sentence was handed down, Hinson’s niece said she feels her children and grandchild are safe now.
“The skies have opened up, and there’s a rainbow now,” she said. “It’s our justice, even though it is a gun charge.”
Hinson’s niece said she testified during the sentencing hearing to protect her family from Hinson.
“I’ve got to protect my grandbaby,” she said. “I’m fine with 25 years. At least my children will be grown when he gets out. This has been two years of hell.”
Hinson’s niece said she was present at the state trial when Hinson was acquitted on charges that he kidnapped two 17-year-old girls on March 13, 2006, and held them in a 5-by-8-foot room beneath a trapdoor in the floor of a shed in his yard.
Hinson faced two counts each of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, assault and battery with intent to kill, and kidnapping. He faced life in prison if he was convicted of any of the six charges, but a jury found him not guilty in August 2007.
Federal public defender Mike Meetze, who represented Hinson in the federal case, objected to the women being allowed to testify.
“Felony possession of a firearm is a victimless crime,” Meetze said. “Anyone who speaks on an unproven allegation ... is just trying to get an increased sentence.”
Wooten ruled to allow the testimony because it is legal for a judge to take a defendant’s criminal record and the characteristics of his or her life into consideration before imposing a sentence.
Moments later, as Meetze was addressing the court, Hinson ordered his attorney to “sit down” and said he was “done” with the hearing.
“You’re going to do what you want to do,” Hinson shouted at Wooten. “ ... I’ve been made to look like a monster because a bunch of crackheads set me up! It makes no difference what the sentence is!”
Wooten told Hinson he didn’t run the courtroom. Hinson responded that Wooten was right because it seemed as if Assistant U.S. Attorney Rose Mary Parham, who prosecuted the case, was running the court.
Hinson moved to have Meetze removed from the case as his attorney earlier because, Hinson said, he hadn’t seen Meetze in more than two months.
That motion to dismiss was denied by Wooten.
A motion by the prosecution to have Hinson deemed an armed career criminal, which can be anyone with three prior drug or violent felony convictions, was granted by Wooten during the hearing.
Because Hinson is considered an armed career criminal, he would receive a 15 years to life sentence instead of the 10-year maximum sentence mandated by a felon in possession of a firearm conviction, Parham said.
Hinson admitted to possessing the gun both in federal and circuit court, Meetze said in an earlier statement.
Wooten ruled in November that Parham could mention that Hinson had been convicted of a felony, but couldn’t mention that he had been convicted of criminal sexual conduct with an 11-year-old in 1991. Hinson was released from prison in 2000 because of good behavior and work credits.
Parham also was prohibited from mentioning Hinson’s state trial and acquittal.
Hinson was arrested after a four-day manhunt that attracted national media attention, authorities arrested Hinson about a mile from his northern Darlington County home. Hinson had been standing in the backyard of a relative’s home asking for water when the relative called 911.
Hinson was sentenced in 1989 to three years in prison after he was convicted of trafficking cocaine. He also was sentenced in 1983 to 1½ years in prison for his conviction in the aggravated assault of a man with a car jack.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Thank you, also, for answering my post and being considerate of other people’s positions. It was a pleasure talking to you!
When I read your post, the first thought that popped into my mind was a quote by Harvey Fierstein: “Never be bullied into silence. Never allow yourself to be made a victim. Accept no one’s definition of your life; define yourself.“
It was very kind of you to respond. Thank you.
My statements are in no way influenced by politics. They are a product of experience, and it is not fear that fires my indignation. It is revulsion and hatred of men and/or women who prey upon society over and over again because we, the people, cannot contain them. As for what adjective I use to describe him, use any of the below. A perversely bad, cruel, or wicked person: archfiend, beast, devil, fiend, ghoul, ogre, tiger, vampire. See kind/cruel. I appreciate your talent for diplomacy and ability to write well. However, (all politics aside?), it is generous of you to “whitewash” him with your politically correct description. By the way, I’m not a Republican.
Concerned, I would truly like to know the source of the indignation contained in your writing, as it exhibits an intense anxiety.
Please don’t misunderstand. I respect your right to display your feelings. After all, an opinion derives from personal feelings.
But I wonder if you truly comprehend the type of individual that Hinson represents.
What I find interesting is Hinson’s reference to being depicted as a monster. The term “monster,“ as used by Hinson in the courtroom, denotes a figment of his indoctrinated imagination. The fact that you used the same term in your indignant description of Hinson denotes the same high degree of indoctrination.
Historically, the term “monster” was used to describe animals that preyed upon helplessness. They were usually abnormally formed, extraordinarily large and powerful, and perversely cruel and wicked. Children of the past grew into adulthood with incredible tales of the “bogeyman.“
Is Hinson really a monster? Or is he a product of a political system that wants Americans to view his degree of unlawfulness as monstrous that it might draw upon their indignation for support?
I personally view Hinson as nothing more than a petty, self-absorbed human that over-stayed his welcome in society.
He now has a permanent residence with the United States government, which is exactly where he belongs, as does all career criminals who utterly fail to tread lightly on society.
Does he really deserve the level of fervent indignation displayed in your writing? Has the current political system instilled that much fear into your thought processes?
In any event, your indignation represents the type of indoctrination upon which the Republican Party loves to prey.
Hopefully your fear will not deprive you of your identity.
Just something to ponder.
Perhaps members of the State Legislature who made the laws should have this man released to live in THEIR neighborhood to prey upon THEIR children.
You just can’t get it right, Morning News, can you?
Just exactly to whom are you catering?
Are you concerned with promoting sensationalism or the truth as determined by the facts?
If it has sex in it, it’s worth sensationalizing, right?
I see fear-filled Republican Party written in every sentence that you print.
Contrary to the headline, this depraved man was not sentenced to 25 years in any underground bunker case.
He received that sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm at the time of his arrest.
Nowhere in your article does it mention, however, that this man will be in federal prison for at least 20 of those 25 years.
But as evidenced by the reader reaction from Concerned, you obviously accomplished your task with your asinine brand of sensationalizing and reporting matters of indecent assault.
To Concerned, the State Legislature made it possible for the “monster” that you fear so much to be released on good-time and work credits.
As for you Morning News, pucker up and keep kissing that Republican Party butt!
Just keep letting these monsters out of prison, and for “good behavior” behind bars, of all things! Of course they will behave behind bars! They want to get out so they can satisfy their depraved urges upon the innocent again. How can they be rewarded for “good behavior” when it was BAD behavior that put them there in the first place? With his record, I would believe those girls in a heartbeat.


Advertisement